<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=that-logo</link>
	<description>The inane babblings of Olly Hodgson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-40401</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-40401</guid>
		<description>I can normally take a step back away from the design, and put myself into the original designer&#039;s eyes, but with this one, it really just looks like a jumble of semi-squarish pieces. It&#039;s definitely better than the 1980&#039;s Rings-only logo but I&#039;m sure they can come up with something better.. .if not, 2012 will be &quot;the year of the ugly logo&quot; for this major event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can normally take a step back away from the design, and put myself into the original designer’s eyes, but with this one, it really just looks like a jumble of semi-squarish pieces. It’s definitely better than the 1980’s Rings-only logo but I’m sure they can come up with something better.. .if not, 2012 will be “the year of the ugly logo” for this major event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weon</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-39385</link>
		<dc:creator>Weon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-39385</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can say what you like about my hairstyle, but it&#039;s never caused epilepsy and cost significantly less than £400,000 to design.&quot;
Boris Johnson on claims that the London 2012 Olympic logo looked like his hairdo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“You can say what you like about my hairstyle, but it’s never caused epilepsy and cost significantly less than £400,000 to design.“<br />
Boris Johnson on claims that the London 2012 Olympic logo looked like his hairdo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38569</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38569</guid>
		<description>Maybe &quot;we’ll get desensitised to it&quot; would have been better.

Oh, and £400k for a complete brand? It&#039;s peanuts in that business!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe “we’ll get desensitised to it” would have been better.</p>
<p>Oh, and £400k for a complete brand? It’s peanuts in that business!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38565</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38565</guid>
		<description>&quot;As part of the overall brand though, it works a lot better (you can see it in context at london2012.com). Over the next few years the brand is going to be used everywhere: On television, billboards, the interwebs, printed media — just about anywhere they can display it. As it becomes more pervasive we’ll get used to it, and if they go about it properly, maybe we’ll even grow to like it.&quot;

are you on Crack?

it&#039;s a £400k pile of utter sh1te

think you&#039;ve been spending to much time with advertising/marketing/etc types!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“As part of the overall brand though, it works a lot better (you can see it in context at london2012.com). Over the next few years the brand is going to be used everywhere: On television, billboards, the interwebs, printed media — just about anywhere they can display it. As it becomes more pervasive we’ll get used to it, and if they go about it properly, maybe we’ll even grow to like it.”</p>
<p>are you on Crack?</p>
<p>it’s a £400k pile of utter sh1te</p>
<p>think you’ve been spending to much time with advertising/marketing/etc types!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon (other)</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38530</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon (other)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38530</guid>
		<description>They have tried to do a banksy image only via paint and a bad colour pallet. The video thing looks like a the intro to a bad 80&#039;s pop music show. They have certainly got a reaction, but 18,000 + people signing a petition to scrap is prob not the best one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have tried to do a banksy image only via paint and a bad colour pallet. The video thing looks like a the intro to a bad 80’s pop music show. They have certainly got a reaction, but 18,000 + people signing a petition to scrap is prob not the best one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38504</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38504</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38502&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Anton&lt;/a&gt; - As far as I can tell, the logo comes in about a squillion colour combos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38502" rel="nofollow">@Anton</a> — As far as I can tell, the logo comes in about a squillion colour combos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38503</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38503</guid>
		<description>Thanks I&#039;ve just watched the video and my head hurts now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks I’ve just watched the video and my head hurts now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38502</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38502</guid>
		<description>But why the feck pink and yellow??? are they going to bring back Rr Blobby to go with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why the feck pink and yellow??? are they going to bring back Rr Blobby to go with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38500</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38500</guid>
		<description>So it took the Lisa Simpson image to bring back a nearly 3 month drought of think drastic ramblings

Anyways thanks for that, I will never look at the logo the same again !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it took the Lisa Simpson image to bring back a nearly 3 month drought of think drastic ramblings</p>
<p>Anyways thanks for that, I will never look at the logo the same again !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bez</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-38496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2007/06/05/that-logo/#comment-38496</guid>
		<description>This one is ace:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6722205.stm

Though I agree about the mellowing. It&#039;s still &#039;ollocks, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is ace:<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6722205.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6722205.stm</a></p>
<p>Though I agree about the mellowing. It’s still ‘ollocks, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: thinkdrastic.net @ 2012-02-07 09:49:28 by W3 Total Cache -->
