<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Failed Redesign: Hope Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=failed-redesign-hope-technology</link>
	<description>The inane babblings of Olly Hodgson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Knoll</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-30820</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Knoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-30820</guid>
		<description>That is indeed an ugly and badly coded site. If I&#039;m correct in my assumption from context that &quot;utter pants&quot; is bad and &quot;the dog&#039;s bollocks&quot; is good, then I agree wholeheartedly with the above comments. Divided by a common language and all that.

Congrats, I stumbled across this page as the only Google result for &quot;example of tag soup&quot; (quotes included in the query).

If I may nitpick for a moment, when you say &quot;It’s like the semantic web never happened,&quot; you may mean &quot;semantic markup.&quot; 

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_web&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Semantic Web&lt;/a&gt;, Sir Tim Berners-Lee&#039;s darling, has indeed never happened, at least not yet. 

It involves endowing the web with machine-readability using RDF, ontologies, etc. When it&#039;s all done, it will blow your socks off and you&#039;ll be able to automatically find answers to all of your questions by writing Prolog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is indeed an ugly and badly coded site. If I’m correct in my assumption from context that “utter pants” is bad and “the dog’s bollocks” is good, then I agree wholeheartedly with the above comments. Divided by a common language and all that.</p>
<p>Congrats, I stumbled across this page as the only Google result for “example of tag soup” (quotes included in the query).</p>
<p>If I may nitpick for a moment, when you say “It’s like the semantic web never happened,” you may mean “semantic markup.” </p>
<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_web" rel="nofollow">Semantic Web</a>, Sir Tim Berners-Lee’s darling, has indeed never happened, at least not yet. </p>
<p>It involves endowing the web with machine-readability using RDF, ontologies, etc. When it’s all done, it will blow your socks off and you’ll be able to automatically find answers to all of your questions by writing Prolog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no comment</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-9795</link>
		<dc:creator>no comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-9795</guid>
		<description>i worked at hope for many years and i have to tell you they think the site is the dogs bollocks, they even have an award hanging on the wall for web site design, i tried to convince them it was a piece of shit but they would just point at the award, please email the designer and brother of the big boss (Allan) to tell him what you really think info@hopetechology.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i worked at hope for many years and i have to tell you they think the site is the dogs bollocks, they even have an award hanging on the wall for web site design, i tried to convince them it was a piece of shit but they would just point at the award, please email the designer and brother of the big boss (Allan) to tell him what you really think <a href="mailto:info@hopetechology.com">info@hopetechology.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3914</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 06:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-3914</guid>
		<description>Definetly a PIA. I would leave the site before I found anything usefull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definetly a PIA. I would leave the site before I found anything usefull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>Having spent a bit of time on the Hope site today, I can report that it&#039;s a right pain in the ass and has absolutely no flow to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having spent a bit of time on the Hope site today, I can report that it’s a right pain in the ass and has absolutely no flow to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>I like the way shimano&#039;s site seems to ONLY work with IE on the mac.. bunch o bum.

Can you wrath be cuddly like a teddy bear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way shimano’s site seems to ONLY work with IE on the mac.. bunch o bum.</p>
<p>Can you wrath be cuddly like a teddy bear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>Weon - They haven&#039;t even got Chess Club Seven!

Matt - Yup :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weon — They haven’t even got Chess Club Seven!</p>
<p>Matt — Yup :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-2236</guid>
		<description>OH wow, that;s pretty hideous.
I only got to the mainpage before my eyes bled.

Am I going to have to do SCUK and Stif really well to avoid your wrath ?

;p)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH wow, that;s pretty hideous.<br />
I only got to the mainpage before my eyes bled.</p>
<p>Am I going to have to do SCUK and Stif really well to avoid your wrath ?</p>
<p>;p)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weon</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Weon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>I agree Olly - utter pants. It reminds me slightly of the original look of eggsbox.co.uk and that is really not a good thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Olly — utter pants. It reminds me slightly of the original look of eggsbox.co.uk and that is really not a good thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdrastic.net/journal/2006/03/08/failed-redesign-hope-technology/#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>Haha thats like some kids uber geek homepage they made using a template off a php template site. The sort you find for gaming forums and the like. All it was missing was some nice flash animation on the logo :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha thats like some kids uber geek homepage they made using a template off a php template site. The sort you find for gaming forums and the like. All it was missing was some nice flash animation on the logo :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
